Martin Luther King Day Celebration :: Click to see Events Schedule!

Click for Franklin, North Carolina Forecast

Opinion Editorial

Recently the President mused about making voting mandatory. Mr. Obama said, "It would be transformative if everybody voted – that would counteract money more than anything." The plan probably would end up with even more money being spent on elections. Hordes of additional disinterested voters would be ripe for cheesy catch phrases with attack ads showing candidates filmed in black and white, while moving ominously in slow motion.

It might be transformative if everyone decided voluntarily to vote, but the mandatory part is a little spooky. There's something odd about being forced to exercise freedom. Imagine compulsory recitations of the pledge of allegiance. Sure, we make the kiddies say words they might not understand, but we grownups aren't going to be told what to do. A lot of folks enjoy flying American flags at their homes but that pride and satisfaction would scatter to the wind if flag display was required under penalty of law.


Everything this nation once stood for is being turned on its head.

Free speech, religious expression, privacy, due process, bodily integrity, the sanctity of human life, the sovereignty of the family, individuality, the right to self-defense, protection against police abuses, representative government, private property, human rights—the very ideals that once made this nation great—have become casualties of a politically correct, misguided, materialistic, amoral, militaristic culture.

Indeed, I’m having a hard time reconciling the America I know and love with the America being depicted in the daily news headlines, where corruption, cronyism and abuse have taken precedence over the rights of the citizenry and the rule of law.

What kind of country do we live in where it’s acceptable for police to shoot unarmed citizens, for homeowners to be jailed for having overgrown lawns, for kids to be tasered and pepper sprayed for acting like kids at school, and for local governments to rake in hefty profits under the guise of traffic safety?


The legal row between Innovation Brewing in Sylva and Bell's Brewing from Michigan serves as an example of the murky waters of “intellectual property.” The “property” the two craft brewers are haggling over is the word “innovation” and its subsequent trademark usage. Bell's has been applying legal pressure for Innovation to rescind their federal trademark application because the word innovation is also used on a Bell's bumper sticker. There are also, to date, 2,172 other trademark filings that use the word “innovation.” One would think that there is plenty of “innovation” to go around for everyone.

This custody battle over a word has taken on the David vs. Goliath metaphor since Bell's brews about 600 times the amount of beer that Innovation does with no-doubt, the legal resources to match. The classic excuse made by those yielding the legal sledgehammer is that they only want to protect the public by avoiding brand confusion. You know, the kind of brand confusion you have between Paris, France and Paris, Tennessee. One is home to the Eiffel Tower and the other the home of the World's Biggest Fish Fry. Which is which? So much confusion!


Should one be intolerant toward intolerance? This question comes into play concerning the recent controversy at the University of Oklahoma. Making the rounds in the latest edition of America's racial divide is a 10- second impromptu video of a group of Sigma Alpha Epsilon (SAE) frat boys on a chartered bus chanting a racially-charged diatribe, that referenced lynching. This episode of America's Got NO Talent would have been of little consequence, if not for someone's phone camera and subsequent posting on the Internet.

To date, SAE has had its fraternity status suspended at the college and two students have been expelled. Of course college athletes can commit actual crimes without the teams they “represent” being barred from the school, so it appears that guilt by association may have monetary-based limitations.

OU has disregarded the issue of freedom of speech and seems to be dabbling in thought control. The event in question did not involve official college business, a university workplace, class time or even in what would be considered a public area. Unfortunately, neither is it a one-of-a-kind incident and the school's condemnation may have more to do with public relations than ethics. It wouldn't be the first time a (possibly) drunk college student said something incredibly stupid. However, it may be the first time such an incredibly stupid and counterproductive response has come from a college administration.


Page 5 of 68

Macon County News is now on:
Find the Macon County News on Facebook! and Find the Macon County News on twitter!
Facebook   Twitter